Abstract: The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China specifies the protection of personal information, but at present there is no uniform legislation on personal information protection, and there is a lack of effectiveness of legal responsibility, and the informed consent rule is also alienated from its application. At this time, we should discuss the informed consent rule and financial liability of personal information protection from the legal system of its parties based on DEPA, and clarify the content of the “5 elements” notification rule based on the distinction of our informed consent rule and the combination of our laws and the laws of New Zealand, so as to improve the application of the informed consent rule. And in terms of financial liability, the amount of compensation will be increased, and clarify related offenses with criminal penalties as an entry point to protect the security of personal information.

Key words: informed consent rules, personal information, criminal liability, Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA), comparative analysis

摘要： 《中华人民共和国民法典》明确了个人信息的保护，但目前对个人信息保护没有统一的立法，法律责任存在有效性缺位，而其中的知情同意规则也存在适用的异化.此时应立足《数字经济伙伴关系协定》(DEPA)，从其缔约方的法律体系中探讨个人信息保护的知情同意规则与经济责任等内容，在区分我国知情同意规则的基础上，在我国与新西兰法律的基础上明确“5要素”通知规则的内容，提高知情同意规则的适用可能.在经济责任方面提高适用赔偿数额，并以刑事处罚为切入点明确相关犯罪行为，为个人信息的安全保驾护航.

关键词: 告知同意规则, 个人信息, 刑事责任, 数字经济伙伴关系协定, 比较分析