信息安全研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1): 82-.

• 学术论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

欧盟人工智能监管沙盒制度及其启示

徐伟张丽梅   

  1. (重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院重庆400065)
  • 出版日期:2026-01-10 发布日期:2026-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 徐伟 博士,教授.主要研究方向为人工智能法学. lawxuwei123@163.com
  • 作者简介:徐伟 博士,教授.主要研究方向为人工智能法学. lawxuwei123@163.com 张丽梅 硕士研究生.主要研究方向为人工智能法学. zlmhangiei@163.com

The EU Artificial Intelligence Regulatory Sandbox System and Its Enlightenment#br#
#br#

Xu Wei and Zhang Limei   

  1. (College of Cyberspace Security and Information Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065)
  • Online:2026-01-10 Published:2026-01-10

摘要: 为应对人工智能技术快速发展带来的潜在风险与监管挑战,探索如何在保障公共安全的同时激发技术创新已成为当前监管制度改革的核心议题.采用制度分析方法,系统性地剖析了欧盟人工监管沙盒制度在促进技术创新与保障公共安全之间的平衡作用.研究发现,该制度虽具有降低企业风险成本、提升监管效能的积极意义,但也存在适用场景局限、责任豁免范围有限以及准入过程滋生权力寻租的问题.基于欧盟经验,我国可从以下方面推进人工智能监管沙盒制度的探索:统筹技术创新与公共安全,设立央地协同的监管机构;优化申请、评估、测试、报告与退出等流程;提升消费者风险承受能力,保障知情权和受偿权;并通过设立监管聊天室和制度激励,推动该制度的有效实施.

关键词: 人工智能, 监管沙盒, 欧盟, 公共安全, 科技治理

Abstract: In order to cope with the potential risks and regulatory challenges brought by the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, exploring how to stimulate technological innovation while ensuring public safety has become the core topic in the current reform of regulatory systems. This paper proposes an institutional analysis method to systematically analyze the balancing role of the EU’s artificial regulatory sandbox system in promoting technological innovation and ensuring public safety. The research findings reveal that although the system has the positive significance of reducing the risk cost of enterprises and improving the effectiveness of supervision, it also has the problems of limited application scenarios, limited scope of liability exemption and the emergence of power rentseeking in the access process. Based on the experience of the EU, China can advance the exploration of the artificial intelligence regulatory sandbox system in the following aspects: coordinating technological innovation and public safety, and establishing a centrallocal coordinated regulatory agency; optimizing the application, evaluation, testing, reporting and exit process; improving consumers’ risk tolerance, and safeguarding their rights to know and to be compensated; and through the establishment of regulatory chat rooms and institutional incentives to promote the effective implementation of the system.

Key words: artificial intelligence, regulatory sandbox, EU, public safety, science and technology governance

中图分类号: