信息安全研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3): 238-241.

• 政策法规专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

取消部分审批许可后的商密管理合规与《网络安全法》的若干问题

原浩   

  1. 江苏竹辉律师事务所
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-21 出版日期:2018-03-15 发布日期:2018-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 原浩
  • 作者简介:原浩 硕士研究生,主要研究方向为高新技术企业与信息网络安全法律实务.

Several Issues on Compliance with Commercial Cryptography Regulations and the Cybersecurity Law after Cancelling of Part of the Approval Items

  • Received:2018-03-21 Online:2018-03-15 Published:2018-03-21

摘要: 国务院46号文和国密局336号文体现出在《国家安全法》《网络安全法》实施和 《密码法》《出口管制法》制定过程中“以我为主”、“张弛有度”的监管趋势,从涉外(或称跨境)企业的合规角度而言,需要从研发生产、销售、使用、进出口等多维度构筑因应策略,以实现对新近密集立法的必要遵从.特别是《网络安全法》的“数据本地化”和出境评估要求下,如何对密码技术和基于密码的数据进出境进行规范,亦是企业需加以审视的全新角度.对相关发文和配套指引进行了相应解读,并对涉及的与前述网络空间安全基本法相关的若干问题进行梳理和分析,以供合规参考.

关键词: 商用密码, 技术审查, 型号证书, 标准密码, 出境评估

Abstract: Complying with National Security Law and Cybersecurity Law of PRC, the #46 document of State Council, as well as the #336 document of State Cryptography Administration honored and encouraged the idea to rely more on the FOEs and be more flexible in regulating commercial cryptography. In response to massive newly enacted rules and regulations, FOEs must adapt their policies in multiple dimensions including research, production, sale, use, exportation, and importation. More importantly, data localization and export evaluation requirement under Cybersecurity Law created a new demand for FOEs to regulate its cryptography technology and international data exchange. This article takes on the perspective of corporations, interprets the two documents mentioned above and their related instructions, and further analyzes the issues posed under Cybersecurity laws and regulations.

Key words: commercial cryptography, technical review, type certificate, standard cryptography, export evaluation