信息安全研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3): 195-200.

• 政策法规专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

刑事司法实践中“电子数据”取证存在的 问题及对策建议

刘鹏   

  1. 陕西省人民检察院
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-21 出版日期:2018-03-15 发布日期:2018-03-21
  • 通讯作者: 刘鹏
  • 作者简介:刘鹏 博士研究生,主要研究方向为网络社会治理、网络安全法.

The Problems and Countermeasures of obtaining evidence from "electronic data" in criminal judicial practice

  • Received:2018-03-21 Online:2018-03-15 Published:2018-03-21

摘要: 随着互联网、人工智能、电子产品不断发展,人们的生活发生了巨大变化,与此同时,在司法实践中,电子数据正发挥着不可替代的作用,其对于证明犯罪事实、认定犯罪的价值愈加重要。同传统证据取证比较,电子数据取证仍然是薄弱环节,主要表现在:基层侦查人员缺乏专业化知识,不注重提取原始存储介质,互联网企业配合司法机关取证态度消极等方面。要解决上述问题,除了完善相关法律法规之外,还可以通过提高基层侦查人员专业化素质,建立专业电子数据取证人才库和专家辅助人机制,明确互联网企业协助司法机关的义务和责任等措施来解决。

关键词: 证据, 取证, 证明, 电子数据, 刑事诉讼

Abstract: With the continuous development of the Internet, artificial intelligence and electronic products, great changes have taken place in people's lives. At the same time, in the judicial practice, electronic data are playing an irreplaceable role. For the purpose of proving the facts of crime, the value of criminalization is even greater important. Compared with the traditional evidence-based evidence-gathering, electronic data evidence collection is still the weak link, mainly manifested in the following aspects: lack of specialized knowledge at the grassroots level, lack of attention to the extraction of original storage media and internet enterprises' negligence of obtaining evidence with the judiciary. To solve the above problems, in addition to improving relevant laws and regulations, it is also possible to improve the professional quality of grass-roots investigators, establish a professional database of evidence-based electronic forensics and expert supporters, and clarify the obligations and responsibilities of Internet companies to assist the judiciary solve.

Key words: evidence, forensics, prove, electronic data, Criminal procedure