全生命周期数据安全管理和人工智能技术的融合研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 数据逐渐成为新型生产要素，我国已将数据安全提升至国家战略高度.随着新一轮科技革命推动和数字化转型不断深化，人工智能技术的发展潜力日益凸显，并逐渐为数据安全管理领域积极赋能.首先，介绍了数据安全全生命周期管理的概念和意义，分析了数据在生命周期各个阶段所面临的安全风险，并进一步论述了传统数据安全管理技术在海量数据处理和攻击手段升级的背景下所面临的问题和挑战；然后，介绍了人工智能为解决这些问题和挑战的潜在优势，并总结了目前比较成熟且典型的基于人工能的数据安全管理技术和应用场景；最后，对人工智能技术在数据安全管理领域未来的发展趋势进行了展望.旨在为数据安全管理领域的研究者和实践者提供有益的参考，推动人工智能在数据安全管理技术领域的创新和应用.

关键词: 人工智能, 数据安全管理, 全生命周期管理, 自然语言处理, 数据隐私保护

Abstract: With data becoming a new production factor, China has elevated data security to a national strategic level. With the promotion of a new round of technological revolution and the deepening of digital transformation, the artificial intelligence technology has increasing development potential, and gradually empowers the field of data security management actively. Firstly, the paper introduces the concept and significance of data security lifecycle management, analyzes the security risks faced by data in various stages of the lifecycle, and further discusses the problems and challenges faced by traditional data security management technologies in the context of massive data processing and upgraded attack methods. Then, the paper introduces the potential advantages of artificial intelligence in solving these problems and challenges, and summarizes the current mature data security management technologies based on artificial energy and typical application scenarios. Finally, the paper provides an outlook on the future development trends of artificial intelligence technologies in the field of data security management. This paper aims to provide useful references for researchers and practitioners in the field of data security management, and promote the innovation and application of artificial intelligence in the field of data security management technology.

Key words: artificial intelligence, data security management, lifecycle management, natural language processing, data privacy protection

张昊星, 赵景欣, 岳星辉, 任家东, . 全生命周期数据安全管理和人工智能技术的融合研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(6): 543-.

参考文献

［1］彭超, 靳黎忠, 李中文, 等.面向数据全生命周期的数据安全风险分析［J］. 数字通信世界, 2022 (2): 99101［2］Zhang B, Zhu J, Su H. Toward the third generation artificial intelligence［J］. Science China Information Sciences, 2023, 66(2): 119［3］Galassi A, Lippi M, Torroni P. Attention in natural language processing［J］. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2020, 32(10): 42914308［4］Abdul W, Subarna C, Stratos I. Deeplearning: Systems and responsibility［C］ Proc of the Int Conf on Management of Data. New York: ACM, 2021: 28672875［5］何文竹, 彭长根, 王毛妮, 等.面向结构化数据集的敏感属性识别与分级算法［J］. 计算机应用研究, 2020, 37(10): 30773082［6］Hassan F, Sánchez D, DomingoFerrer D. Utilitypreserving privacy protection of textual documents via word embeddings［J］. IEEE Trans on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021, 35(1): 10581071［7］Chong Peng.Deep learning based sensitive data detection［C］ Proc of the 19th Int Computer Conf on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2022: 16［8］Cai Fangbo, He Jingsha, Zardari Z A, et al. Distributed management of permission for access control model［J］. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 38(2): 15391548［9］Lai Chunming, Chen Meihua, Kristiani E, et al. Fakenews classification based on content level features［J］. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(3): 1116［10］Wang Chenyu, Wang Ding, Tu Yi, et al. Understanding node capture attacks in user authentication schemes for wireless sensor networks［J］. IEEE Trans on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2020, 19(1): 507523［11］Mehraj H, Jayadevappa D, Haleem SLA, et al. Protection motivation theory using multifactor authentication for providing security over social networking sites［J］. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2021, 152: 218224［12］Arshad K, Ali R F, Muneer A, et al. Deepreinforcement learning for anomaly detection: A systematic review［J］. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 124017124035［13］魏国富, 石英村. 人工智能数据安全治理与技术发展概述［J］. 信息安全研究, 2021, 7(2): 110119［14］Zhang Gang, Qiu Xiaofeng, Gao Yang. Software defined security architecture with deep learningbased network anomaly detection module［C］ Proc of the 11th IEEE Int Conf on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2019: 784788［15］Wu Zhijun, Liang Cheng, Li Yuqi. Intrusion detection method based on deep learning［C］ Proc of the IEEE Int Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Sustainable Computing & Communications, Social Computing & Networking. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2022: 445452［16］Wang Juan, Hao Shirong, Wen Ru, et al. IoTpraetor: Undesired behaviors detection for IoT devices［J］. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 8(2): 927940［17］Le D C, ZincirHeywood N. Exploring anomalousbehavior detection and classification for insider threat identification［J］. International Journal of Network Management, 2021, 31(4): e2109［18］Garg S, Kaur K, Batra S, et al. EnABC: An ensemble artificial bee colony based anomaly detection scheme for cloud environment［J］. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 2020, 135: 219233［19］Ding Yi, Wu Guozheng, Chen Dajiang, et al. DeepEDN: A deeplearningbased image encryption and decryption network for Internet of medical things［J］. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2020, 8(3): 15041518［20］Indhumathi R, Devi S S. Sathiya. Healthcare Cramér generative adversarial network (HCGAN)［J］. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 2022, 40(4): 657673［21］Jiang Honglu, Pei Jian, Yu Dongxiao, et al. Applications of differential privacy in social network analysis: A survey［J］. IEEE Trans on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2021, 35(1): 108127［22］Dwork C.Differential privacy［C］ Proc of the 33rd Int Conf on Automata, Languages and Programming. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 112［23］Acar A, Aksu H, Uluagac A S, et al. Asurvey on homomorphic encryption schemes: Theory and implementation［J］. ACM Computing Surveys, 2018, 51(4): 135［24］Vu D H, Luong T D, Ho T B. An efficient approach for secure multiparty computation without authenticated channel［J］. Information Sciences, 2020, 527: 356368［25］Alferaidi A, Yadav K, Alharbi Y, et al. Federated learning algorithms to optimize the client and cost selections［J］. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 2022: 8514562［26］Zou Feng, Chen Xingshu, Luo Yonggang, et al. Spray: Streaminglog parser for realtime analysis［J］. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 2022: 1559270［27］Zhong Ming, Zhou Yajin, Chen Gang. A security log analysis scheme using deep learning algorithm for IDSs in social network［J］. Security and Communication Networks, 2021, 2021: 5542543［28］Van Ede T, Aghakhani H, Spahn N, et al. Deepcase: Semisupervised contextual analysis of security events［C］ Proc of the IEEE Symp on Security and Privacy (SP). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2022: 522539［29］中国信息通信研究院. 人工智能数据安全白皮书［EBOL］. (20190809) ［20230304］. http:www.caict.ac.cnkxyjqwfbbps201908P020190809481299621393.pdf

[1]	孙雷亮. 基于GPT模型的人工智能数据伪造风险研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(6): 518-.
[2]	高亚楠, . 大模型技术的网络安全治理和应对研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(6): 551-.
[3]	孔维一, 李昕, 宋永立, 况博裕, 付安民, . 一种基于远程证明的智能制造设备群的主动防御方案[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(6): 580-.
[4]	刘鹏, 焦小彤, 何睎杰, 王鹤, 张玉清, . 基于知识图谱的中国大陆网络空间安全国际顶级会议数据分析[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(2): 180-.
[5]	艾龙, . 数据安全管理职责划分和追责机制探析[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(1): 73-.
[6]	陈炜忻, 刘嘉奇, . 金融行业漏洞全生命周期管理解决方案[J]. 信息安全研究, 2022, 8(E1): 91-.
[7]	孙才俊, 白冰, 王伟忠, 何能强, 王之宇, 孙天宁, 张奕鹏. 基于指令序列嵌入的安卓恶意应用检测框架[J]. 信息安全研究, 2022, 8(8): 777-.
[8]	陈圣楠, 范新民, 许力. 基于多约束安全工作流的漏洞管理系统[J]. 信息安全研究, 2022, 8(7): 700-.
[9]	金志刚周峻毅何晓勇. 面向自然语言处理领域的对抗攻击研究与展望[J]. 信息安全研究, 2022, 8(3): 202-.
[10]	王晓波, 谢兰天, 郑然德, 徐菲, . 可机读消费的TTPs威胁情报平台体系研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2021, 7(E1): 8-.
[11]	原玉娇罗森林林萌潘丽敏. 融合句义结构模型的短文本推荐算法研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2015, 1(1): 67-73.