医学数字孪生场景下健康数据的风险与治理

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，数字孪生在医学领域得到快速应用.医学数字孪生进一步释放了健康数据蕴含的能量，有望满足患者对精准疾病诊断和个性化医疗服务的需求.针对健康数据的新变化：首先阐述了医学数字孪生如何赋能健康数据的数字化演进，使健康数据获得了前所未有的价值和机能；然后考察健康数据在医学数字孪生场景下面临的新风险；最后立足中国实际状况，从法律资源供给、行政监督管理、技术发展战略以及多元共治模式这4个方面，提出了健康数据的治理策略，以推动医学数字孪生的健康发展.

关键词: 数字孪生, 健康数据, 数字赋能, 数据风险, 法律治理

Abstract: In recent years, digital twins have been rapidly applied in the medical field. Medical digital twins have further released the energy contained in health data, which is expected to meet the needs of patients for precise disease diagnosis and personalized medical services. In response to the new changes in health data, this article first elaborates on how medical digital twins empower the digital evolution of health data, enabling it to gain unprecedented value and functionality. Then, it examines the new risks faced by health data in the context of medical digital twins. Finally, based on the actual situation in China, this article examines the four aspects of legal resource supply, administrative supervision and management, technological development strategies, and diversified governance models, proposing governance strategies for health data to promote the healthy development of medical digital twins.

Key words: digital twin, health data, spatial information, Risk of data, legal governance

中图分类号:

李飞, . 医学数字孪生场景下健康数据的风险与治理[J]. 信息安全研究, 2024, 10(7): 682-.

参考文献

［1］刘艳. 数字孪生迈向“技术+应用”双驱动时代［N］. 科技日报, 20221219(006)［2］Jones D, Snider C, Nassehi A, et al. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review［J］. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2020, 29: 3652［3］Cheng Weibin, Lian Wanmin, Tian Junzhang. Building the hospital intelligent twins for allscenario intelligence health care［J］. Digital Health, 2022, 8: 14［4］Rosen R, Von Wichert G, Lo G, et al. About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing［J］. IFACPapersOnLine, 2015, 48(3): 567572［5］Bagaria N, Laamarti F, Badawi H F, et al. Health 4.0: Digital twins for health and wellbeing［J］. Connected Health in Smart Cities, 2020: 143152［6］Iqbal J D, Krauthammer M, BillerAndorno N. The use and ethics of digital twins in medicine［J］. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2022, 50(3): 583596［7］Exarchos K, Beltsiou M, Votti C A, et al. Artificial intelligence techniques in asthma: A systematic review and critical appraisal of the existing literature［J］. European Respiratory Journal, 2020, 56(3): 111［8］张佳星. 把健康数据“还给”患者［N］. 科技日报, 20230413(003)［9］Akroyd J, Mosbach S, Bhave A, et al. Universal digital twina dynamic knowledge graph［J］. DataCentric Engineering, 2021, 2(4): 1425［10］MilneIves M, Fraser L, Khan A, et al. Life course digital twinsintelligent monitoring for early and continuous intervention and prevention (LifeTIME): Proposal for a retrospective cohort study［J］. JMIR Research Protocols, 2022, 11(5): e35738［11］Kamel Boulos M, Zhang Peng. Digital twins: From personalised medicine to precision public health［J］. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2021, 11(8): 112［12］ Klievink B, Van Der Voort H, Veeneman W, et al. Creating value through data collaboratives［J］. Information Polity, 2018, 23(4): 379397［13］Sahal R, Alsamhi S H, Brown K. Personal digital twin: A close look into the present and a step towards the future of personalised healthcare industry［J］. Sensors, 2022, 22(15): 135［14］闫晴. 数字孪生:风险、溯源及规制［J］. 国家图书馆学刊, 2022, 31(5): 104112［15］Hashizume K, Garcia Rosado D, FernándezMedina E, et al. An analysis of security issues for cloud computing［J］. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 2013, 4(1): 113［16］Wang Cong, Wang Qian, Ren Kui, et al. Toward secure and dependable storage services in cloud computing［J］. IEEE Trans on Services Computing, 2012, 5(2): 220232［17］毕鑫宇. 论居民电子健康档案的数据归属［J］. 档案, 2022 (12): 6063［18］Liddell K, Rumbold J, Pierscionek B. Patient data ownership［J］. JAMA, 2018, 319(9): 935935［19］Liddell K, Simon D A, Lucassen A. Patient data ownership: Who owns your health?［J］. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2021, 8(2): 150［20］Radin M J. Property and personhood［J］. Stanford Law Review.1982, 34(5): 9571015 ［21］齐磊磊. 大数据经验主义——如何看待理论、因果与规律［J］. 哲学动态, 2015 (7): 8995［22］贾向桐. 大数据的新经验主义进路及其问题［J］. 江西社会科学, 2017, 37(12): 511［23］Monrat A A, Schelén O, Andersson K. A survey of blockchain from the perspectives of applications, challenges, and opportunities［J］. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 117134117151［24］Zaman U, Imran, Mehmood F, et al. Towards secure and intelligent Internet of health things: A survey of enabling technologies and applications［J］. Electronics, 2022, 11(12): 143［25］滕亮, 陈兵, 赵开斌, 等. 基于区块链的医疗数据安全共享模型研究与应用［J］. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(9): 884891［26］乔治·阿克洛夫. 柠檬市场: 质量的不确定性和市场机制［J］. 经济导刊, 2001 (6): 18［27］Heller M. The tragedy of the anticommons: A concise introduction and lexicon［J］. The Modern Law Review, 2013, 76(1): 625.

[1]	张帅, 于忠臣, 刘勇, 顾家乐, 冯词童, 杨建, 靳佑鼎, 应志军, . 数字孪生城市大数据平台数据流转安全模型研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2023, 9(1): 48-.
[2]	徐博, 杜鑫, 周纯杰. 数字孪生视角下基于LSTM的工控系统[J]. 信息安全研究, 2022, 8(6): 578-.
[3]	范江波. 信息安全之Web劫持与流量劫持法律治理研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2019, 5(2): 114-129.
[4]	王雷鸣. 恐怖主义网络舆情研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2018, 4(7): 602-610.