信息安全研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 134-.

• 数字社会的安全、隐私与治理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

在线诉讼区块链证据复式可采性规则

韦集馨   

  1. (香港大学法律学院中国香港999077)
    (清华大学智能法治研究院北京100084)
  • 出版日期:2026-02-07 发布日期:2026-01-28
  • 通讯作者: 韦集馨 硕士.主要研究方向为证据法、数据保护法、人工智能法. jixin.wei@connect.hku.hk
  • 作者简介:韦集馨 硕士.主要研究方向为证据法、数据保护法、人工智能法. jixin.wei@connect.hku.hk
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(21BFXO14);国家自然科学基金专项项目(L2424123);教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目(19YJC820039);2025年度司法部部级课题(25SFB3014);2025年度民政部部级课题(2025MZJ005)

Compound Admissibility Rules of Blockchain Evidence in Online Litigation

Wei Jixin   

  1. (Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China 999077)
    (Institute for Studies on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084)
  • Online:2026-02-07 Published:2026-01-28

摘要: 区块链证据为传统电子证据运用困境提供了解决之策,形成新技术司法应用下的“证据自证”新模式.但我国区块链证据规范存在明显局限,未完整覆盖区块链证据在线上、线下双层空间的运用,且侧重于区块链证据的真实性认定,忽视其可采性认定.为实现区块链证据在中国语境下的恰当运用,应当综合运用技术自证与法律推定,构筑区块链证据双层空间架构认定模式,达成共识性正义,明确存证、举证、质证、认证环节的复式可采性规则,以实现法治主义与技治主义良性互动的新型证据法治形态.关键词在线诉讼;区块链证据;电子证据;可采性;证据规则

关键词: 在线诉讼, 区块链证据, 电子证据, 可采性, 证据规则

Abstract: Blockchain evidence offers a solution to the limitations of traditional electronic evidence by establishing a new model of “evidence selfauthentication”. However, current regulations in China exhibit obvious limitations, failing to fully cover the application of blockchain evidence in both online and offline spaces, while prioritizing authenticity at the expense of admissibility. To realize the proper application of blockchain evidence in the Chinese context, this paper proposes a dualspace framework integrating technological selfauthentication with legal presumptions. This approach aims to achieve consensual justice, composite admissibility rules for preservation, presentation, crossexamination, and authentication, and thereby foster a novel form of evidence rule of law with benign interaction between rule of law and technical rule of law.

Key words: online litigation, blockchain evidence, electronic evidence, admissibility, rules of evidence

中图分类号: